Our Brisbane Corporate Lawyers advise clients on all aspects of corporate law and compliance with the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). We advise organisations on how to create, build and protect sustainable shareholder value. With our unique commercial perspective and multidisciplinary approach, we advise clients on a wide range of corporate law and compliance matters.
Our corporate law services
We are particularly passionate about the project management of the capital raising process as an integral part of the legal engagement. We utilise modern project management tools to ensure that decisions are made in a timely and consistent manner to meet the needs of the market and to reduce overall legal fees. Our corporate law services in this area include:
- mergers and acquisitions – acquisition or divestitures of businesses;
- compliance and company secretarial;
- directors’ duties;
- appointing an Alternate Director
- corporate Governance Frameworks;
- continuous disclosure obligations;
- selective share buybacks;
- financial assistance whitewashes;
- related party transactions;
- employee share option schemes; and
- vendor due diligence.
Industry expertise
Our corporate law services are particularly relevant to the following industry sectors:
- engineering;
- artificial intelligence;
- quality assured businesses;
- corporates undergoing digital transformation;
- cyber security consultants;
- digital marketers;
- family businesses;
- gambling;
- game developers;
- health and life science;
- international companies;
- IoT (Internet of Things);
- IP rich businesses;
- IT service providers;
- lawyers for franchisors;
- managed service providers;
- online businesses;
- patented and branded products;
- SaaS providers;
- software developers;
- professional services;
- web and mobile app developers; and
- therapeutic goods manufacturers.
Recent videos about aspects of corporate law
Disclaimer
This page contains general commentary only about corporate law. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
Why choose Dundas Lawyers®?
Having exerted Blood Sweat and Years® since April 2010 we are the team you want on your side for the long term to act as the ‘bodyguard’ for your business to complete legal forensic investigations and case preparation. Some of the reasons clients choose Dundas Lawyers® include:
- our Uncommon business acumen;
- our Uncommon expertise in transactional, compliance and litigious matters;
- our Uncommon expertise forensic case preparation;
- our Uncommon customer focus;
- the fact that we don’t just know law, we know business!
- how we leverage our Uncommon Nous® to provide client centric solutions.
Considering getting a lawyer to advise your business?
For a confidential, no obligation initial telephone call to find out how we can help your business gain an uncommon advantage in corporate law please phone our team on either 1300 386 529 or 07 3221 0013.
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Complete the form below and we will respond to your enquiry within one (1) business day from the moment you press Submit.
Corporate law enquiry
Legislation
Recent insights about corporate Law
-
WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context
The recent case of WIJOAV Services Pty Ltd v Goldstone Private Equity Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 622 (WIJOAV v Goldstone) involved a claim of shareholder oppression under section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act). The case established that a shareholder in a private equity fund may be oppressed by a co-investor where…
-
Federal Court dismisses continuous disclosure claim
The Federal Court recently dismissed Australia Securities and Investment Commission’s (ASIC) claim in Australian Securities and Investment Commission v Nuix Limited [2026] FCA 490 (ASIC v Nuix) that Nuix Limited breached its obligations under section 674 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act). Nuix Limited (Nuix) successfully contested ASIC’s allegation that it had breached…
-
Does your start-up meet the ESIC tax-offset criteria?
Federal government introduced the Tax Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives for Innovation) Act 2016 (Cth) to provide tax incentives for investors in an eligible early stage innovation company (ESIC), including 20% up-front non-refundable tax offset and capital gains tax (CGT) exemption for all types of investors meeting criteria.
-
Valuing ESS Interests
A company, whether listed or unlisted, can grant its employees an interest in its equity (ESS Interest), including through an employee share scheme (ESS) or employee share option plan (ESOP). There are restrictions contained in both the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) and Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) (ITAA) that determine the price…
-
ESS vs ESOP – what’s the difference?
Employee share schemes (ESS) and employee share option plans (ESOP) are commonly used by corporations to incentivise employees and align performance with company growth by providing them with an interest in the company. While the terms are often used interchangeably, they have distinct legal and structural differences under Australian law. This article explains the key…
-
Disputed ESOP – Selak v National Tiles Co Pty Ltd
In the case of Selak v National Tiles, the Vic Supreme Court considered whether a company breached an option agreement governed by the terms of an Employee Share Option Plan (ESOP) by requiring an option holder to execute an undisclosed shareholders’ agreement as a condition of exercising vested options.
-
Can a unit trust be wound up by the oppression remedies
The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corps Act) grants the Courts the power to award remedies under section 233, specifically designed to address situations of oppression within corporate entities under section 232. These remedies, also known as the “Oppression Remedies”, aim to resolve situations where a company’s conduct unfairly prejudices its members or shareholders. While primarily…
-
Directors’ obligations to comply with Accounting Standards
Directors are personally liable for ensuring their company operates in accordance with corporate governance and accounting standards. Obligations contained in part 2M.2 and 2M.3 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) outline obligations for companies to keep financial records and prepare annual financial and director’s reports. Sections 180 and 344 of the Corporations Act…
Recent Federal Court decisions regarding corporate law
-
Australian Workers’ Union v John Holland Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 892
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for temporary stay of proceedings pending determination of related Fair Work Commission proceedings – where prospective relief is sought and only available in the competing proceeding – where the competing proceeding is a non-judicial proceeding – where a temporary stay favours the health and safety of workers, and the timely…
-
Chapcon Building Services Pty Ltd v Spectrum Homes Qld Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 873
COPYRIGHT – statement of claim alleged that director of company caused, authorised, directed or procured company to engage in conduct alleged to infringe copyright in plans – no material facts pleaded to support conclusion – no evidence adduced on summary judgment application to demonstrate any foundation exists to make allegation – uncontested evidence adduced by…
-
Girchow Enterprises Pty Ltd v Ultimate Franchising Group Pty Ltd (Final Orders) [2023] FCA 500
Federal Court orders franchise agreement void, personal guarantees declared void ab initio. Awards of $1.8M, $1.9M and $1.5M in compensation made, and further orders issued.
