copyright dispute lawyer

Proposed changes to use of orphan works

HomePrivate: BlogIP litigation and disputesCopyright infringementProposed changes to use of orphan works

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

On 13 August 2020, Paul Fletcher MP, Minister for Communications, Cyber Safety and the Arts, announced amendments to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Act).  The amendments follow two (2) years of stakeholder consultation, and finalise the Government’s response to the Productivity Commission’s 2016 Intellectual Property Arrangements Report.  The reforms focus on the use of “orphan works”, with an aim to provide a framework for copyright that is fit for the digital age.

What are orphan works?

Orphan works are works where the copyright owner cannot be identified, meaning it is difficult for a proposed user to seek permission to reproduce them.  An orphan work can be any type of work in which copyright subsists, such as photographs, paintings, written works and sound recordings (Orphan Work).

Works may be orphaned through a variety of circumstances, including where:

  • the work created was a long time ago;
  • required information was missing or deliberately removed, such as lack of metadata on images online; and
  • the owner has inadequate skills or tools to accurately claim rights in the works.

There is no specific provision in relation to the use of Orphan Works in the Act.  Unless covered by an exception or licence, the use of an orphan work may amount to an infringement of copyright.

Exceptions

There are some exceptions which allow individuals to use or reproduce orphan works.  These include the fair dealing exception and a statutory license.  The fair dealing exception only covers specific circumstances, including:

  • giving legal advice;
  • news reporting;
  • criticism;
  • research; and
  • parody.

Libraries and archives may also utilise orphan works for socially useful purposes under section 200AB of the Act.  The Copyright Amendment (Disability Access and Other Measures) Act 2017 (Cth) enhanced protection for libraries and archives to an extent by permitting them to create “preservation copies” of resource in their collections without infringing copyright.

A proposed limited liability scheme for use of orphan works

The proposed amendments include a limited liability scheme for use of Orphan Works.  This scheme will permit the use of copyright material where:

  • a reasonably diligent search has been performed, but the copyright owner cannot be identified or located; and
  • as far as reasonably possible, the work has been clearly attributed to the author.

The scope of diligent searches has not yet been confirmed, so it is strongly recommended for creative industries and other relevant sectors to assist in establishing guidelines around performing diligent searches.

If a copyright owner comes forward, users will be exempt from liability for use of the work for the period it was orphaned.  However, users will only be allowed to continue using the work on reasonable terms as agreed with the copyright owner or as fixed by the Copyright Tribunal.  If reasonable terms cannot be met, the copyright owner may seek an injunction against future use of their work.

Other proposed amendments

There are other proposed amendments of the limited liability scheme, including:

  • new specific fair dealing exception for quoting copyright material, subject to the quotation occurring for the purposes of non-commercial use;
  • the update of the library and archives exceptions, so that they are equally applied to all copyright materials and are technologically neutral;
  • the amendment of education exceptions, where current limitations and uncertainties around the use of copyright material in classroom teaching are removed; and
  • the streamline of government statutory licensing regime, which involves simplifying the method of determining fees payable to collecting societies and how these are paid.

Takeaways

The proposed reforms are forecast to benefit both the owner of an Orphan Work and the users of the works. It will allow orphan works to be utilised in creative industries, and will result in larger collections of works to be increasingly accessible by libraries, archives and educational institutions.

Links and further references

Legislation

Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)

Copyright Amendment (Disability Access and Other Measures) Act 2017 (Cth)

Report

2016 Intellectual Property Arrangements Report

Further information about orphan works

If you need advice on any protecting your copyright, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free and discussion:


Related insights about orphan works

  • What are end user licence agreements?

    What are end user licence agreements?

    Understand the legal risks of end-user license agreements (EULAs): learn about the common clauses, conditions, and warranties that can protect both the licensee and the licensor. Find out how to ensure your EULA is legally sound.

    Read more …

  • Copyright infringement for computer code

    Copyright infringement for computer code

    Computer code is automatically protected by copyright. Unauthorised reproduction of it may constitute an infringement, as illustrated by two federal cases. To understand copyright infringement with respect to computer code, read “Who owns the code?”

    Read more …

  • Patents, grace periods and revocation explained

    Patents, grace periods and revocation explained

    Disclosure of an invention prior to applying for a patent can have serious implications. Learn more from Dundas Lawyers to understand the important considerations, including the twelve (12) month grace period and its effect on revocation.

    Read more …

  • Who holds ownership of the code?

    Who holds ownership of the code?

    Understand who owns the computer code used in software development projects. Consider employee or contractor engagement, joint ownership, and assignment of copyright to ensure your project is protected.

    Read more …

  • A guide to intellectual property

    A guide to intellectual property

    This article provides an overview of the grounds of invalidity available for revoking a patent, including lack of novelty, inventive/innovative step, usefulness, secret use, manner of manufacture, fraud, false suggestion/misrepresentation, sufficiency, fair basis, and best method.

    Read more …

  • What exactly is a certification trade mark?

    What exactly is a certification trade mark?

    Learn about the differences between certification marks and standard trade marks, the complex process of obtaining one, the certification rules, and more in this comprehensive article. Discover why certification marks are important and how they can benefit your business.

    Read more …

  • Government’s response to Productivity Commission’s report on intellectual property

    Government’s response to Productivity Commission’s report on intellectual property

    The Australian Government is taking steps to shape the future of intellectual property rights. Find out what changes are being proposed and how they could affect you.

    Read more …

  • What if neither party in proceedings takes a step?

    What if neither party in proceedings takes a step?

    The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) (UCPR) outline considerations and rules for a period of inactivity when continuing legal proceedings in the Queensland Courts. Learn more about what to consider when continuing proceedings.

    Read more …

  • Proposed changes to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)

    Proposed changes to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)

    The Copyright Amendment (Disability Access and Other Measures) Bill 2017 (Bill) modernises copyright laws and provides greater access to culturally significant materials. Learn more about how this bill could affect the education, libraries and archives sectors, and how it could provide improved access to copyright material for persons with a disability.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend